<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holocaust Boredom – The Latest Thought Crime</title>
	<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/203</link>
	<description>How can you have the last word if you haven't heard the first?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: MRB</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/203#comment-23741</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/203#comment-23741</guid>
					<description>The holocaust industry makes another haul.  This time Belgium is shaken down for $170 million.  Despite the fact that Belgium fought against Germany during the war, they voted to dole out the shekels to jews who supposedly lost property and goods during the German occupation.

Notice that the article states: "$54 million will be paid to individual claimants with the rest going to a Jewish trust that will help the poor and keep the memory of the horrors of the Holocaust alive."

Thus $116 million will go to jewish groups so they can line their pockets and erect even more holocaust museums that European school children will have to make pilgrimages to.

See &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,336731,00.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The holocaust industry makes another haul.  This time Belgium is shaken down for $170 million.  Despite the fact that Belgium fought against Germany during the war, they voted to dole out the shekels to jews who supposedly lost property and goods during the German occupation.</p>
<p>Notice that the article states: &#8220;$54 million will be paid to individual claimants with the rest going to a Jewish trust that will help the poor and keep the memory of the horrors of the Holocaust alive.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thus $116 million will go to jewish groups so they can line their pockets and erect even more holocaust museums that European school children will have to make pilgrimages to.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,336731,00.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> for article.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: M.A.B.</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/203#comment-4754</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/203#comment-4754</guid>
					<description>I left out a "not" in my post...should read "...it is NOT clear from the story..."

M.R.B.-

Is the boredom actually a crime, or merely a disqualifier for "public" "service?"  Both needed quotes, because both are euphemistic terms of art.

It doesn't actually bore me, though I do deny it.  So, I may guilty of a crime, but not disqualified from public service.  Since does a criminal record disqualify from public service?

If Disney goes ahead and releases the film, we'll definitely have to have a special movie night.

M.A.B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left out a &#8220;not&#8221; in my post&#8230;should read &#8220;&#8230;it is NOT clear from the story&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>M.R.B.-</p>
<p>Is the boredom actually a crime, or merely a disqualifier for &#8220;public&#8221; &#8220;service?&#8221;  Both needed quotes, because both are euphemistic terms of art.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t actually bore me, though I do deny it.  So, I may guilty of a crime, but not disqualified from public service.  Since does a criminal record disqualify from public service?</p>
<p>If Disney goes ahead and releases the film, we&#8217;ll definitely have to have a special movie night.</p>
<p>M.A.B.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MRB</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/203#comment-4734</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/203#comment-4734</guid>
					<description>M.A.B. -

The "think" tank is saying that Disney (the old Disney, of course) is guilty of slave misery denial.  But those who find their (the "think" tank's) view of slave misery uninteresting are guilty of slave misery boredom.  Both are hate crimes, but of a slightly different variety.  I sense from your tone that you are guilty of both and so will have to forward your comment to &lt;a href="http://www.ihr.org/webpics/abe_foxman.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;Abe Foxman&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M.A.B. -</p>
<p>The &#8220;think&#8221; tank is saying that Disney (the old Disney, of course) is guilty of slave misery denial.  But those who find their (the &#8220;think&#8221; tank&#8217;s) view of slave misery uninteresting are guilty of slave misery boredom.  Both are hate crimes, but of a slightly different variety.  I sense from your tone that you are guilty of both and so will have to forward your comment to <a href="http://www.ihr.org/webpics/abe_foxman.jpg" rel="nofollow">Abe Foxman</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: M.A.B.</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/203#comment-4732</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/203#comment-4732</guid>
					<description>Similarly, I read a story today in which a member of a black think tank criticized Disney's Song of the South because it portrayed Uncle Remus as a happy storyteller, which, of course, could not have been true because he was a plantation worker, and, as we KNOW, all plantation workers here unhappy and had chips on their shoulders much the same as do many blacks today.  It was the happy storyteller aspect that upset this guy, because that violates the Official Interpretation of slave life in the Old South (although it is clear from the story that Remus was even a slave).

M.A.B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similarly, I read a story today in which a member of a black think tank criticized Disney&#8217;s Song of the South because it portrayed Uncle Remus as a happy storyteller, which, of course, could not have been true because he was a plantation worker, and, as we KNOW, all plantation workers here unhappy and had chips on their shoulders much the same as do many blacks today.  It was the happy storyteller aspect that upset this guy, because that violates the Official Interpretation of slave life in the Old South (although it is clear from the story that Remus was even a slave).</p>
<p>M.A.B.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JonathanB</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/203#comment-4549</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/203#comment-4549</guid>
					<description>Let's hope that they don't get their hands on a copy of Hal Lindsey's 'Road to Holocaust.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope that they don&#8217;t get their hands on a copy of Hal Lindsey&#8217;s &#8216;Road to Holocaust.&#8217;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
