<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick note on posting comments</title>
	<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/324</link>
	<description>How can you have the last word if you haven't heard the first?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: TJH</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/324#comment-27142</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/324#comment-27142</guid>
					<description>A few days ago, a reader notified us that his post did not appear. Thus, this is a reminder to notify us if your post does not make it through. As should be obvious, we delete posts so rarely that one can practically say never, and want to know when the auto spam catcher fails.

On an unrelated note, we have added a rule on comment-posting. Announcing "this is the last time I will be posting, but..." will not be permitted. That is just a sly way to put oneself beyond rebuttal. Such phrases will be deleted without indication. (Other editorial deletions will continue to be shown by elision marks.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago, a reader notified us that his post did not appear. Thus, this is a reminder to notify us if your post does not make it through. As should be obvious, we delete posts so rarely that one can practically say never, and want to know when the auto spam catcher fails.</p>
<p>On an unrelated note, we have added a rule on comment-posting. Announcing &#8220;this is the last time I will be posting, but&#8230;&#8221; will not be permitted. That is just a sly way to put oneself beyond rebuttal. Such phrases will be deleted without indication. (Other editorial deletions will continue to be shown by elision marks.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BB</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/324#comment-21710</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/324#comment-21710</guid>
					<description>I've been thinking for some time that anybody Christian who supported Bush in the second election should not be allowed to comment or endorse a candidate in any elections for a minimum of ten years. Maybe we could add a few years if they supported Ghouliani or McCain....I hear Huckabee's no better...

There could be positive results if we made this national...Imagine how much cleaner the air would be. :D

BB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking for some time that anybody Christian who supported Bush in the second election should not be allowed to comment or endorse a candidate in any elections for a minimum of ten years. Maybe we could add a few years if they supported Ghouliani or McCain&#8230;.I hear Huckabee&#8217;s no better&#8230;</p>
<p>There could be positive results if we made this national&#8230;Imagine how much cleaner the air would be. :D</p>
<p>BB
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TJH</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/324#comment-21167</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 03:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/324#comment-21167</guid>
					<description>More and more it is becoming evident that Candy and the other "theonomic judeo-fascists" are not going to back up their claims with anything more than bluster. At some point, we are just going to have to let them go, and leave them to a hard but, we hope, life-changing Providence to bring about a change in mind in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More and more it is becoming evident that Candy and the other &#8220;theonomic judeo-fascists&#8221; are not going to back up their claims with anything more than bluster. At some point, we are just going to have to let them go, and leave them to a hard but, we hope, life-changing Providence to bring about a change in mind in them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew Taylor</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/324#comment-19920</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/324#comment-19920</guid>
					<description>Just testing out your new comment thingy...

I find it hilarious -- absolutely, completely, positively, totally, utterly, knee-slapping, hysterically hilarious -- that Davy B's $2,300 donation to Rudolf Ghouliani was squandered by the "little man in search of a balcony." Ron Paul isn't going to be the Republican nominee, but neither is The Man Who Would Be Emperor. So sorry, Davy B...perhaps you and Candy can now jump on the McCain bandwagon, what with the other pro-baby killing liberal you have previously supported (Ahnold) backing the man who promises to be in Iraq for 50, 100, or 1,000 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just testing out your new comment thingy&#8230;</p>
<p>I find it hilarious &#8212; absolutely, completely, positively, totally, utterly, knee-slapping, hysterically hilarious &#8212; that Davy B&#8217;s $2,300 donation to Rudolf Ghouliani was squandered by the &#8220;little man in search of a balcony.&#8221; Ron Paul isn&#8217;t going to be the Republican nominee, but neither is The Man Who Would Be Emperor. So sorry, Davy B&#8230;perhaps you and Candy can now jump on the McCain bandwagon, what with the other pro-baby killing liberal you have previously supported (Ahnold) backing the man who promises to be in Iraq for 50, 100, or 1,000 years.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
