<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reverse Yiddish</title>
	<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/345</link>
	<description>How can you have the last word if you haven't heard the first?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: TJH</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/345#comment-25634</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/345#comment-25634</guid>
					<description>Eliza -- yes they "should" be consistent, but consistency is not part of their agenda. I cannot but conclude that the double standard, and the corruption of language and thought by embedded ambiguity, is all part of a deliberate strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eliza &#8212; yes they &#8220;should&#8221; be consistent, but consistency is not part of their agenda. I cannot but conclude that the double standard, and the corruption of language and thought by embedded ambiguity, is all part of a deliberate strategy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ElizaF</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/345#comment-25585</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/345#comment-25585</guid>
					<description>Yes, but if I fight a Jew in self-defense and not for ethnic reasons at all, it's still anti-semitic (according to them). In fact anything that is not 100% supportive of Jews is considered anti-semitic (by them). Even using the word "Jew" is anti-semitic. I think "Jewish" is better liked. I'm just using their standards, with which I disagree, but saying they should be consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but if I fight a Jew in self-defense and not for ethnic reasons at all, it&#8217;s still anti-semitic (according to them). In fact anything that is not 100% supportive of Jews is considered anti-semitic (by them). Even using the word &#8220;Jew&#8221; is anti-semitic. I think &#8220;Jewish&#8221; is better liked. I&#8217;m just using their standards, with which I disagree, but saying they should be consistent.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TJH</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/345#comment-25458</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/345#comment-25458</guid>
					<description>Eliza -- the hebishkeit would say they are fighting the Palestinians in self-defence, and thus not an ethnic matter at all. What needs to be pointed out though is their attitude to all non-hebes, which ranges from exploitation as mere animals at best, and at worst, visceral hatred that is murderous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eliza &#8212; the hebishkeit would say they are fighting the Palestinians in self-defence, and thus not an ethnic matter at all. What needs to be pointed out though is their attitude to all non-hebes, which ranges from exploitation as mere animals at best, and at worst, visceral hatred that is murderous.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ElizaF</title>
		<link>http://butler-harris.org/archives/345#comment-25368</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://butler-harris.org/archives/345#comment-25368</guid>
					<description>Yes, Arabs are semites, too. So Jews are anti-semitic when they fight the Palestinians, a flaw that must be pointed out to the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Arabs are semites, too. So Jews are anti-semitic when they fight the Palestinians, a flaw that must be pointed out to the former.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
