Now we are two
I’m not big on birthdays any more. However, the occasion makes a convenient excuse to answer questions and explain a few things.
By now, the reason we do movie reviews should be apparent. They are a major part of our culture, so criticism thereof must be part of a broad critique of that culture. My goals in reviewing movies are modest, and can be stated simply: 1. Share at least one thought that is “out of the box,” whether that should be highlighting a subtle theme of the movie itself, or its hidden agenda, or its social backdrop. 2. Say enough about a movie that a reader that is tracking with us can make a decision to view or not to view. 3. Be brief. As to (1), each reader must decide for himself if the goal is met. But in view of that intent, I urge even those that do not watch movies to give a few of our reviews a try. Some general societal or theological comments might be found interesting, even apart from the goal of (2).
Why, some apparently wonder, do we spend so much time talking about niggers, kikes, degos, and honkies? Glad you asked.
The first level of answer is, we don’t “spend so much time.” Scan through the last 30 or 50 posts and see. The perception that we do is itself a sign of how the mental nerves of our people have been rubbed raw and become swollen and hyper-sensitive by the systematic manipulation of our enemies. Speech that was common among men 50 years ago (see Godfather I and II, for example) has now gotten even males all in a tizzy for reasons that they would be hard-pressed to identify. What is most ludicrous is to hear Christians, even pastors, go on as though the politically correct etiquette is actually a mark of sanctification — as if the blaspheming jews who have fobbed this new morality off on us via the various media would have been in a position to instruct the nation in the rules of Christian morality — a morality that the nation was earlier unaware even existed!
In this matter, we are sensitive to the Great Divide between the sexes. There are vulgarities that ought never to be broached in mixed company even if each sex might, on occasion, use them within its own company. I am quite sure that our biggest problem in this area, however, is not the ladies, but rather the feminized of the male sex. The latter do not become real women, but they have ceased to be real men either. They are useless to both. The good news, however, is that it has been shown that even a beaten dog can be retrained to a restored dignity. Certainly, we have become a nation of beaten dogs!
We will not be able to rise up, protect our women, and throw off our enemies as long as we are timidly looking over our shoulder and saying, “am I allowed to say that?” Therefore, a complete purge of politically correct (philo-semitic) speech is necessary, even if you must for a time go to the opposite extreme to restore the creased paper. This instinct is confirmed by the practice of the vast majority of our reawakened people.
We have evolved toward certain anniversary topics throughout the year. I like the idea, even if some may need to be dropped and others added from time to time. Here is what we have so far:
9/11 — The date of the worst false-flag hoax in 40 years, which has had the effect of tethering our nation’s fortunes even more tightly to the interests of our mortal enemies.
1/15 — Marty’s birthday. If God gives me strength, I would like to say something every year about this wicked man who has done such lasting harm to our nation, for at least as long as my alma mater Westminster Seminary continues to honor him. A variant on this might be to “remember” Black History Month — which might better be called “The Black Unmaking of History Month.”
2/13 — the destruction of art-city Dresden, Germany by the “Allies.” Likewise,
7/24, the destruction of Hamburg by the “Allies,” featuring the first deliberate use of napalm on civilians.
Two WW2 anniversaries per year may be too much to sustain. On the other hand, it can give the wrong impression by way of understatement. For more than two years, the murder and mayhem inflicted on German civilians was a nearly daily affair. The proper way to bring this home might be to do an “anniversary post” every day for a year, showing pictures of the story-book town that we burned to rubble on that day. But that is a lot of work for a working man.
Other, more positive anniversaries might be selected. I’m thinking of April 14, the date of Lincoln’s assassination, or May 10, John Wilkes Booth’s birthday, for example.
A year ago, I wrote (but never got around to posting) “our growth has been slow but steady. We now have a bit more than a battalion of unique visitors each week. About 25% are foreign. Remember that Google offers a translation utility, so let no one be put off by the English language. Welcome to all.” On the subject of foreign readers (now more like 30% of the total), we encourage especially our European readers to make comments, even in your own language. If in German, French, Italian, or Russian, I will attempt to render a translation into English. Of course, the same rules for posting apply.
That growth continued through May of this year, to the point that several times we exceeded a half-battalion in single days. Then the jewgle google censorship kicked in. As a result, we have fallen a bit below where we were a year ago. The biggest disappointment is that our message will tend to be “preaching to the choir” to some extent. The dragnet that brought in others has been cut by the enemies of our people. But we will fight back. It is all the more important to spread the word by linking or notifying your friends, if you like our message, or even just find it worth pondering.
The future of this site bodes more of the same, only more so. There seems to be no end to the fallacies of our sick age that need exploding, even in the church. As MB said earlier in a nice turn of phrase, “one of the few benefits of living in an era of insanity is that it makes the peddlers of the most prosaic and obvious truths appear like sages.” The “look” certainly needs refurbishing — ours has to be one of the visually most ugly blogs out there. In time, dear reader, in time. We expect to do more and more podcasts, for those that prefer audio. Also, I hope to start providing some teaching aids for home-schoolers that might be able to utilize some of our material, in the form of review questions and quizzes. The translation of Solzhenitsyn will resume. An idea I am considering is to do a weekly exposé, over some period up to a year, of the zionist propaganda disguised as Christian reporting known as World magazine.
On with the fun!
I’ve been working on programming and hacking here and there and hopefully my developing skill will be of some use in the future in figuring out a “workaround” for Jewgle.
Comment by danielj — August 15, 2008 @ 6:43 pm
While I’m in the choir, I still appreciate the site and encourage your work to continue. I quit reading World magazine when I saw a ridiculous amount of “Judeo-Christian” advertisements, which suggested some sort of special brotherhood between the two faiths. I would love to see your work on World, particularly as it relates to the chief editor, and alleged Jewish convert, Marvin Olasky.
In an article elsewhere he wrote (last paragraph) the following troubling, but interesting two sentences which manages to reference Hitler, Islamo-fascists, Bush, Evangelicals, liberty, and “final solution.”
“Hitler, like many of today’s Islamo-fascists, was out to kill Jews, Christians and leftists. And that’s why it’s particularly strange to see, in ‘American Theocracy’ and other productions, the sense that George W. Bush and U.S. evangelicals are a fascist threat, rather than the defenders of liberty against those who would impose a new ‘final solution.’”
Comment by Joshua — August 16, 2008 @ 12:44 pm
Joshua — oh that is too funny! I’m going to print that out and hang it in my cubicle for comic relief whenever I get depressed. To refute the Jew-lasky’s diarrhea of the mouth point by point would be anti-climactic. That quote could serve as a litmus test for whether one’s gestalt vision is still mired in the ethos of our oppressors, or is free and thus able to see its silliness in a single glance. Good sleuthing.
Comment by TJH — August 16, 2008 @ 9:41 pm
I would be interested in hearing your take on the Russia Georgia situation.
Comment by M — August 18, 2008 @ 1:48 am
M -
1) My take is pro-Russia. There are several reasons. But the easiest one to explain is that the Establishment in Washington and the U.S. media are against Russia. This is the same as saying the Jews don’t like Russia. This is all we need to conclude that Russia must be doing something right.
2) Israelis and Americans were training the Georgian army. This also tells us that Georgia (which is actually just a puppet) is up to no good.
3) Anyone who has only heard the U.S. media about the conflict has no idea what really happened. The Georgian army launched an unprovoked attack on civilian targets in South Ossetia, including a hospital and killed 2000 civilians. Russia was responding to Georgian aggression in order to protect its citizens residing in S.O.
4) The U.S. and Israel are behind Georgia’s actions. The neo-cons want to bring Georgia into NATO to further isolate and intimidate Russia so that they can have a free hand in Central Asia and the Middle East.
The good news is that Russia crushed the Georgians and their made-in-Israel and -America military. This does not bode well for them (Israel and the U.S.) when it comes to Iran. Now the neo-cons are putting their anti-missile defenses in Poland, further provoking Russia. The situation is dangerous because Russia won’t back down.
I’m not completely sure about Russia, but nationalism is running strong there. That is a good thing. It may be that Russia is, from a human point of view, the last hope for Aryans and Christendom. If this is the case, let us pray that Russia is the stalwart against the judaization of the western world.
Indeed, there may come a time when we should begin to consider emigrating to Russia.
Comment by MRB — August 18, 2008 @ 2:09 pm
You make good points, but Russia should let Chechnya go.
Comment by ElizaF — August 18, 2008 @ 7:34 pm
One point I would add to MRB’s excellent outline is in reference to #3. Georgia not only offensively attacked thousands of civilians in S.O., they also slaughtered a number of Russian troops in the region. The Russian response so far has been completely justified.
Comment by Josh — August 19, 2008 @ 10:53 am
MB put my thoughts on the Georgia/Russia situation better than I could have. Let me add a few tips on how to listen to the news and reach the truth through the haze, for the sake of some of our readers that may still be beginners at decoding the jew.
1. Listen to/read a variety of sources. I listen to the BBC news hour on NPR whenever I can (9 AM in Philadelphia area), NPR itself, NY Times online, newspapers that might be left on counters (don’t waste money on any of them of course), TV shows that might be on at restaurants or bars, and as much of Rush or Hannity that I can stomach if I happen to be driving during their shtick. They are all playing by the same playbook, but occasionally something will slip through the crack and you maximize the probability of catching it by diversifying. Some, like Hannity, are so in captive to the cryptocracy that you can pretty much assume the opposite of what he is saying. Others, like BBC, are also captive, but have enough professional integrity that little hints of the truth keep leaking out.
2. Listen especially as close to the event as possible. By the time a couple days have gone by, the troops have all been brought into line. But it takes a little while, and sometimes precious nuggets slip out before the party line has been disseminated. I could give some very interesting examples of this when time allows.
3. Train your ears to pick up odd forms of expression that many talking heads are suddenly using, out of the blue. Leading up to Miss Lewinsky’s War (against Serbia), the phrase that overnight became cliche was “humanitarian catastrophe.” Suddenly everyone, left and “right,” was speaking about what a “humanitarian catastrophe” it was that Serbia was “ethnically cleansing” Kosovo; we had to go do something about it. In this case, the instant cliche was launched by W himself: “disproportionate force.” “Territorial integrity” was another one. Suddenly NPR, talk radio, everyone was using those phrases. Almost as if they had all gotten the same poop sheet on their FAX machines that morning.
4. Listen for contradictions in the “story.” In this case, they were legion.
a. While discussing the situation at a bar a couple weeks ago, someone overheard the conversation and passed me a USA Today article. It was amazing. The headline was something like “Russia invades and conquers Georgia.” Then, at the end of the article, buried on an inside page where few are probably expected to turn, were interviews with actual refugees. Without exception, they all talked about the attack, not of Russia, but of Georgia. Why did they print it? Did it slip past the editor? Do they want to put some real facts in for plausible deniability, but bury them where few will read? Your guess is as good as mine.
b. The very phrase, “disproportionate force” indicates, not an unprovoked attack, but a provoked response, which however was “disproportionate.”
(and notice the W’s cynical appeal to Christian Just War principles in using this phrase — a concept he has certainly never followed in any of his wars)
c. The notion of “territorial integrity” is used to exactly the opposite intent than with Serbia. If anyone had a claim to territorial integrity, it was the Serbs in respect to Kosovo. But there, the cryptocracy’s ends were better served by denying territorial integrity. They appeal to “principles” to put a moral patina on their schemes, but the principles they appeal to cancel themselves out.
Comment by TJH — August 23, 2008 @ 7:40 pm
Very interesting. I know from people who have relatives in Georgia that the MSM is not accurately reporting the news. Russia is not the aggressor.
Speaking of terms coming up out of the blue, does anyone remember how suddenly “gravitas” became a popular word in the news?
Comment by ElizaF — August 24, 2008 @ 2:05 pm
Here is some heartening news. With Russia calling the U.S./Israeli bluff, I think the scheduled attack on Iran may be postponed. Although there is always a danger to cornering a wild beast.
Comment by MRB — August 25, 2008 @ 11:27 am
Thanks for the commentary regarding the Georgia Russia situation. I’ve heard from several sources that the whole incident is ultimately an attempt by the cryptocracy/world mafia to destroy America and eventually bolster a successful merge of the various unions that have come to be over the years. Apparently the Georgia Russia affair was predicted by several individuals on the Alex Jones show some time ago. Have any of you seen the ENDGAME documentary by Jones concerning the merging of the unions?
Comment by M — August 25, 2008 @ 4:46 pm
“Apparently the Georgia Russia affair was predicted by several individuals on the Alex Jones show some time ago.”
It was Paul Craig Roberts and Bob Chapman among others.
Comment by Josh — August 26, 2008 @ 8:13 am
“But the easiest one to explain is that the Establishment in Washington and the U.S. media are against Russia. This is the same as saying the Jews don’t like Russia. This is all we need to conclude that Russia must be doing something right.”
Mr. Butler, I know you teach logic but your above statements is not all we need (or necessarily) to conclude that Russia is doing something right. Come on, are you going to reason like this, that just because the Jews don’t like Russia, therefore the Russians are doing something right?
“The U.S. and Israel are behind Georgia’s actions. The neo-cons want to bring Georgia into NATO to further isolate and intimidate Russia so that they can have a free hand in Central Asia and the Middle East.”
How do you know that the US and Israel is behind this?
“I’m not completely sure about Russia, but nationalism is running strong there. That is a good thing.”
Since when is nationalism a good thing? When I hear Christians say nationalism is a good thing, I get cautious.
“It may be that Russia is, from a human point of view, the last hope for Aryans and Christendom.”
What? Last hope of Aryans from what? Last hope of Christendom from what exactly?
Comment by Abby — August 27, 2008 @ 12:38 am
Abby -
(1) If you knew the Talmud, the history of the jews, the history of the jews in Russia, and the recent events concerning the jews and Russia, you would not ask this question.
(2) You are taking the logical point a bit too seriously. But think of it this way. Since the judaics are the greatest threat that Aryans and Christians face (I do not equate Aryans and Christians, btw) and since a white Christian nation is being attacked by the judaics, chances are that the white Christian nation must have done something right.
(3) That America and Israel back Georgia is not in dispute. One, I suppose, may wonder whether they pushed Georgia into attacking S. Ossetia and the Russian “peace keepers” stationed there. This can be answered affirmatively by asking a few questions. Would Georgia grapple with Russia without outside backing? Do America and Israel have a good deal of influence on Georgia?
(4) Your fear of nationalism is due to the propaganda you have uncritically believed from government schools (including Christian schools whose textbooks follow that American statist line), the media, and politicians.
(5) Nationalism can be summed up as the view that the good of one’s own nation should be placed above the good of others. What is inherently dangerous about that? Isn’t that what governments are supposed to do? That alternative to nationalism is globalism and internationalism. And these are the political philosophy of Babel, not Zion.
(6) Bluntly put, from subjugation and extinction. It would take a couple of essays to answer this question in detail. I will here offer just one point. Europe is dying (in another generation or so, Aryans will be in the minority given current birthrates) and America is being overrun by non-white races. The unpopular fact is, the Western world will not survive without the white man. Russia seems to see this problem and is doing a few things to reverse this trend. Thus, the only country I see much hope for the Aryan is Russia.
As for Christendom, Russia may be last thing resembling a Christian nation. Here is an excerpt from an article in Time magazine.
“The [Orthodox] Church’s assertiveness and presence is growing — with little separation from the State. The Moscow City Court and the Prosecutor General’s Office maintain Orthodox chapels on their premises. Only the Orthodox clergy are entitled to give ecclesiastic guidance to the military. Some provinces have included Russian Orthodox Culture classes in school curricula with students doing church chores. When Orthodox fundamentalists vandalized an art exhibition at the Moscow Andrei Sakharov Center as “an insult to the main religion of our country,” the Moscow Court found the Center managers guilty of insulting the faith, and fined them $3,500 each. The ROC had an opera, based on a famous fairy tale by the poet Alexander Pushkin, censored to the point of cutting out the priest, who is the tale’s main protagonist.”
I applaud all of this. Sure there are problems with Orthodoxy and sure the politicians are probably using the church for their own ends, but would that we had these problems in America.
Keep reading FW, Abby. We realize most react strongly to us at first. But if you stick with us and keep an open mind, you will find that almost everything we say has been said before (and better) by our ancestors; and that our ancestors were almost always right.
Comment by MRB — August 27, 2008 @ 12:50 pm
MRB,
I think it might be a stretch to say the Russian Orthodox Church “resembles” anything Christian. My experience with it in Moscow, western Russia, Siberia and Ukraine has led me to believe it is a cult of the highest order.
Iknow I’m arguing from points of personal experience and am making a weak case. However, if my experiences are anywhere near the truth then the ROC is something akin to the “voodoo” Catholicism” we see and experience in central and south America.
Please feel free to offer criticism if you feel I’m off on this.
CAH
Comment by CAH — August 27, 2008 @ 4:21 pm
Here is an interesting article entitled A New 911 Clue, on Israel’s involvement in 911 and a brief reference to the Georgia affair - http://www.infowars.com/?p=4172
And here is an interesting piece on the Talmud - http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html
Comment by M — August 28, 2008 @ 12:12 am
While you’re at it read this article concerning Amazon.com’s ban on Hoffman’s new book entitled Judaism Discovered - http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/page9/page9.html
Comment by M — August 28, 2008 @ 12:52 am
CAH -
Well, yes, Orthodoxy has many problems. I have a few articles on it here, here, and here. Despite its problems, it is still something recognizably Christian.
M -
Thank you for the links. It gets tedious to document facts that are readily available to anyone with internet access. Thus anytime one of our readers does this for us is a nice service. It would be even more helpful to links to more mainstream sources such as foreign papers and websites of recognized authorities. This way readers won’t have the excuse of saying, “oh, that just Alex Jones the conspiracy nut.” Not that I have anything against Alex Jones, but he does come off as a bit nutty to those who have not had the Gestalt switch.
Yes, Amazon is not selling Hoffman’s book. So much for its claim to be unbiased. I am currently reading Judaism Discovered and plan to write a review on it soon.
Comment by MRB — August 28, 2008 @ 10:58 am
I did find this small blurb here /www.dw-world.de/dw/function/0,2145,12215_cid_3601158,00.html on Deutche Welle page.Not much more than a quick note, but still there… s.hoffmeister
Comment by steve hoffmeister — August 28, 2008 @ 6:48 pm
Mr. Butler,
“If you knew the Talmud, the history of the jews, the history of the jews in Russia, and the recent events concerning the jews and Russia, you would not ask this question.”
I have heard many things about how evil the Talmud is, and I believe you. They are unregenerate and capable of much evil. With this there is no debate. But I always wanted to see the Talmud myself and know there is alot of censorship going on, is there any source I can read the Talmud myself?
“You are taking the logical point a bit too seriously. But think of it this way. Since the judaics are the greatest threat that Aryans and Christians face (I do not equate Aryans and Christians, btw) and since a white Christian nation is being attacked by the judaics, chances are that the white Christian nation must have done something right.”
I am not an Aryan, but I think your response is a rehashing of the same argument earlier which I thought did not logically follow.
“(3) That America and Israel back Georgia is not in dispute. One, I suppose, may wonder whether they pushed Georgia into attacking S. Ossetia and the Russian “peace keepers” stationed there. This can be answered affirmatively by asking a few questions. Would Georgia grapple with Russia without outside backing? Do America and Israel have a good deal of influence on Georgia?”
I did some research, and you are right.
“Your fear of nationalism is due to the propaganda you have uncritically believed from government schools (including Christian schools whose textbooks follow that American statist line), the media, and politicians.”
What? I think you generalize too easily. I fear nationalism not because of statist propaganda, wouldn’t the State want Nationalism?
“Nationalism can be summed up as the view that the good of one’s own nation should be placed above the good of others. What is inherently dangerous about that? Isn’t that what governments are supposed to do? That alternative to nationalism is globalism and internationalism. And these are the political philosophy of Babel, not Zion.”
I’m not a globalist nor a nationalist, and I prefer to see small local power more than anything. It’s such nationalism that sees one’s nation’s good above another that continually allow the Right to support evil for the agenda of our nation.
“Europe is dying (in another generation or so, Aryans will be in the minority given current birthrates) and America is being overrun by non-white races. The unpopular fact is, the Western world will not survive without the white man.”
Isn’t the west dying because of its rejection of Christ rather than it being not white?
“As for Christendom, Russia may be last thing resembling a Christian nation.”
Have you been to Russia? My limited young experience seem to pull me in another direction
Comment by Abby — August 29, 2008 @ 10:42 pm
For further confirmation of point 3 in comment #8 — my jaw dropped open today at Border’s as I was scanning the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. No fewer than three of the very buzz-words I mentioned were used! The article dealt with a meeting between Merkel and Medvedyev. Medvedyev defended Russia’s action in Georgia by using the very phrase the neo-cons used to justify interfering in Serbia in the 90’s: Russia needed to prevent a “humanitäre Katastrophe.” (Med’s use was undoubtedly tongue-in-cheek, or ironic.)
Then Merkel told told him the response was “nicht verhältnismäßig” — i.e. disproportionate.
She went on, “bei Verhandlungen müsse die territoriale Integrität Georgiens der Ausgangspunkt sein” i.e. “the starting point in all negotiations must be the territorial integrity of Georgia.”
Comment by TJH — September 1, 2008 @ 3:13 pm
MRB,
“As for Christendom, Russia may be last thing resembling a Christian nation.”
Is this coming from someone who once said, “There are no Christian civilizations extant today”? Apparently you believe that Russia is Christian enough that the idea of fleeing the US to Russia seems reasonable.
And your only evidence of a growing Christian Russia is a quote from a Time magazine in which you did not provide any citation for.
You side with the Russians because Jews are against this Russian intervention (but what Jews exactly?) and therfore Russia must be doing the right thing. Abby brought up how sloppy that is logically already. You advocate a Just War Theory (and is it supported from Scripture???) but haven’t applied it to Russia to see if it fulfill your checklist as given in http://butler-harris.org/archives/173.
“Even if a nation has a just cause and a right to intervene, it must not engage in warfare unless it is the last resort. An appeal must first be made to right before recourse is made to might.” (From http://butler-harris.org/archives/173)
And did Russia first made recourse before using might?
“The means of a just war must be both discriminative and proportional.”
Using this principle in your own words, can we say that the conflict was waged proportionally when Russia has expanded the conflict to involve neighboring country of Abkhazia?
Comment by Slimjim — September 5, 2008 @ 3:57 pm
Abby -
(1) The Soncino Talmud (found online here) is only partially censored. It uses code words in some instances to mislead the goyim. The Steinsaltz translation is the least censored edition, but was never completed.
(2)Assuming you really are taking issue with the logical form of the argument and not the truth of the premises, your criticism is true but beside the point. True, the argument is not valid, but I was not offering it up as a deductive argument. Think of it more along the lines, if it walks like a duck . . .
(3) The ungodly state fears nationalism and promotes instead its ugly Doppelgänger, statism. The former is love for one’s people, one’s nation, the latter is love of one’s government. I assume that those who have a fear of the former have (which is an unnatural fear), have been influenced by the propaganda.
(4) If you understood nationalism correctly, your fears would evaporate. If anything, a love for one’s people provokes sympathy for other people.
(5) You write:
“Isn’t the west dying because of its rejection of Christ rather than it being not white?”
The question is confused. The West is not an abstraction such as “countries who have a tradition of liberal political ideals,” but something concrete. The West is constituted by the Aryan tribe. Given this, yes, it is because of its rejection of Christianity that the West is dying.
Put another way, if a non-white race became predominantly Christian and achieved a history as rich and glorious as Europe between, say, 1500 and 1850, it would still not be the West. And even if we push the date back to classical Greece, the same would still hold, though this would, of course, complicate the matter.
(6) No, I am not sure about Russian Christianity. I may be wrong here, but hold out hope.
I commend you for your openness. That you did some investigating speaks well of you. Again, stick with us.
Comment by MRB — September 5, 2008 @ 4:51 pm
The propaganda expression today is “buy in”. The bail out is no longer a bail out, but a buy in.
Comment by Joshua — October 1, 2008 @ 1:49 pm
What happened to MRB’s bailout post?
Comment by GV — October 1, 2008 @ 5:24 pm
Seems like the site has been having a lot of technical difficulties lately
Comment by Josh — October 1, 2008 @ 6:05 pm
Indeed — the bailout post is not visible to me, but MB sees it. Anyone that might know what is going on, please comment or contact us.
Comment by TJH — October 1, 2008 @ 7:12 pm
You two are always seeing stuff I don’t seem to see. It’s good to know this time I can blame it on the site.
Comment by GV — October 1, 2008 @ 9:44 pm
It isn’t just the bailout post. There are many days (like earlier today) where I can’t access this site at all. Instead, I get a wordpress error message.
Comment by Josh — October 3, 2008 @ 12:47 am
We’ve been hacked. I figured out how to restore the worst damaged file, which caused the no-access, yesterday. We have a plan to get fully back on our feet, but it will take a few days.
In the meantime, if links to ads or worse start appearing, it is not us. It will be fixed.
Comment by TJH — October 3, 2008 @ 5:08 am
It looks like the technical skills around here are subprime or Alt A at best. Better call in some federal guys to get this headed back in the right direction. What’s it gonna take to bail this sucker out? 7 billion, 70 billion??? Just give me a number!
Comment by CAH — October 3, 2008 @ 4:26 pm
To continue the points in #8 — now even the NY Times is starting to sheepishly leak the truth about Russia and Georgia — information that anyone could have already deduced two months ago using the techniques summarized there.
Comment by TJH — November 7, 2008 @ 9:08 am